Yahoo Answers is shutting down on 4 May 2021 (Eastern Time) and the Yahoo Answers website is now in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.
Would it have made a difference if the guy at Tiananmen Square had a gun?
If not, then how does the second amendment help stop a tyrannical government?
u_bin_called, I like your argument better. Still, there's the problem of modern weapons firing at a much faster rate than muskets. Modern guns are deadlier than 18th century artillery. Does the 2nd amendment include the right to bear artillery?
6 Answers
- ?Lv 62 weeks ago
Once again, I refer you to the citizen soldiers of Vietnam. They defeated 2 super powers.
- 2 weeks ago
It'd make a difference if they all did, and had sense enough to snipe instead of getting in firefights.
- u_bin_calledLv 72 weeks ago
how does the First Amendment stop tyrannical government....or the Fifth....or the Seventh?
answer: they DON'T.... The Bill of Rights exists to outline what the government cannot do to infringe upon INATE rights, lest they become tyrannical....
- Jack BootLv 62 weeks ago
Show me where the people making that argument ever said that one guy with a gun can destroy four tanks.
Your analogy is stupid.
- Anonymous2 weeks ago
Not unless guns bring democracy.
