US airways or Air France?

Find out if one of the airlines uses Airbus planes, then take the other one. I hate flying on an Airbus. Those things sound like they are falling apart.

Us Airways France

I would go Air France because I like the service better. The only downside is Charles de Gaulle International is not an easy airport to connect in. Another factor to consider is if you have a frequent flier account with any airline. If you have a frequent flier account with Air Canada, then you should fly US Airways because both airlines are members of the Star Alliance and you can earn Air Canada miles by flying a partner airline.

I fly US Airways domestically two to three times per month. I've always been treated great by them, so I would take them over any other airline.

In 2010, I flew them between Philadelphia and Dublin. The flight was smooth, comfortable and relatively quick. The food was pretty good and it was an easy trip both ways.

I have to travel overseas every-month for business purposes. There are lots of airlines flying from Toronto to London everyday. Some of the popular airlines are Lufthansa Airline, American Airlines, Air Canada, British Airways etc. Mostly I travel with that airline which is immediately available for my destination. I directly interact with my online travel agent " http://flytimetravel.net/ " to book my ticket. So, I have traveled mostly with all the airlines.

Last I was traveled in Air France from Toronto to London. I like its services and Air France Airline is faster than US Airways and others. But it was much expensive as compare to other airlines. I also traveled with AA and Air Canada in just USD 1141 but Air France airfare is double as compare to them. But For Business purposes, I always prefer Air France airline because it is faster than all airlines.

Have travelled with both and would never go with Air France again.

I would from personal experence say US Airways.

FWIW, Concorde's routes have been VERY limited via the previous due 1990's. if truth be told it became into flying London ny/Paris ny only. by way of noise and pollution regulations it would desire to easily gain it extremely is marketed 2.0Mach speeds over the Atlantic, and easily for a comparatively couple of minutes. expenses weren't inexpensive: one paid the completed-fare 1st classification cost tag, plus a "Concorde surcharge" which became into in actuality yet another finished-fare cost tag. This rapidly limited the passengers that have been going to fly it. It continuously lost funds and became into subsidized via the French and British government's. It became right into a flying white elephant, via the time of its death. it extremely is only my opinion yet i'm confident that a: the declining passenger checklist (it became into mechanically flying with under a million/2 of its passenger load) b: loss of gov't subsidies c: increasing gas expenses the crash became right into a handy time to study the completed software; and only end it. once you look heavily on the completed software, no longer only the bright white jet-you will see there became into no longer something to be "jealous of"....

AIR FRANCE!!!AIR FRANCE!!!