Yahoo Answers is shutting down on 4 May 2021 (Eastern Time) and the Yahoo Answers website is now in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.
Why all the fuss over Jackie Chan's comments?
I mean, haven't we shed over the last decades every last vestige of our anti-communism? Didn't we say with the election of Obama that we want government to control us now? Why criticize Chan over something we want for ourselves?
Nirv--you are an example of just one more lib who believes that somehow, in some way, big government here will be different than big government elsewhere.
But there is good news for you. You haven't lost touch with reality. How can you lose touch with something you never had to begin with?
Heiryu--then how do you explain Taiwan? How do you explain Hong Kong when the British had it?
5 Answers
- Anonymous1 decade agoFavourite answer
Those who don’t agree with Jackie have no idea what China is like. The majority of the Chinese would agree with Jackie, including both of my native Chinese parents. And Jackie makes a great point. The Chinese people aren’t ready for total freedom yet or things would turn out chaotic, as Jackie said. The Chinese can’t behave themselves due to the fact that Chinese don’t have a strong moral teaching background such as religion.
If Jackie Chan really is against China, or what others consider now, a "traitor", he'd let China have its total freedom and watch his beloved Country collapse due to riots and other horrible sprees.
If they can't even stop their cities from being smogged by their own factories... what makes them think they can do better with "freedom"?
This isn't any "recist" or "traitor" comment he's making. He's expressing how his people will be due to how they've been throughout the past years. I mean, look at the recent Olympics, if they can't control themselves at such an event... why do they even deserve this? Truely, the Chinese--or anyone for that matter--who are against Jackie Chan clearly do not see or understand what his comments spoke of. He wants to save China from being any worst than it is already.
If it means being hated because I want to help a country out, then I'm on Jackie's side too.
GRRRR
I dont think I answered your question in ANY way, but this topic just annoys me so much. Sorry.
**EDIT**
When the British had it was long ago. There is no exception of course to that I understand, but we are talking about now and the future. I completely see why you'd mention these and why Jackie Chan has his own point of view as well, but this is something--to me--that's quite hard to explain.
- ?Lv 61 decade ago
Everyone is a critic.
China doesn't need US-style democracy.
Taiwan was a military dictatorship for nearly 40 years, they built up their economy without freedom or democracy.
Hong Kong was a British colony for over 100 years, no democracy there while Britain ruled Hong Kong.
- Anonymous1 decade ago
He was referring to free Chinese like in Taiwan. He said they aren't ready in mainland China to have such freedom. He points to Tawain as an example. Which I totally disagree with Mr. Chan. But he's entitled to his opinions. Lucky for the Chinese he's not a politician.
- Anonymous1 decade ago
What in the world Obama in your rant is have to do with Jackie Chan ? lol.... You repugs are completely have lost touch with reality...lol
- ZingerLv 41 decade ago
People in America are no longer allowed to have opinions not sanctioned by obama administration.